Run Lola Run: Free Will vs. Determinism Argument #1

Both the ideas of Free Will and Determinism are present within the film. While some may be a bit more subtle than others, here is an example of a scene that I’ve extracted and chose to focus on.

 In the beginning of the movie, when Manni is panicked on the phone by having lost $100,000 on the subway to pay back his boss, he decides to rob a local grocery to revive the money.

Manni: “So find 100,000 in 20 minutes… [and meet me] At 12:00 by the water tower around the corner or he will kill me. Nobody escapes Ronnie. He’ll rub me out, and all that’s left of me will be 100,000 ashes.”
[——— ]
Lola: "Stay put in the booth, I’ll come over to you as soon as possible, I’ll figure out a way to raise 100000 by noon”
Manni: “I’m going to rob the bank right here and right now… Or no, I’ll rob the grocery store instead..."

This is a perfect example that argues both for the Free Will and Determinism argument. A a libertarianism could claim how Manni has the "free will” to rob the local grocery store because he CHOOSES to do so based on his principles. You could say that it was Manni's idea that came to his own mind, which was a result of a non-physical event. Although robbing a store is illegal, we (or in this case, Manni) can technically rob a bank if we wanted to. However, this scenario can also create the debate that Manni didn’t have free will, but rather, it was determined that he did so. A determinist could argue that Manni robbed the store because he HAD to, in order to revive the money, otherwise he would’ve been “killed” by his boss if he hadn’t. Here, we see that his actions for robbing the grocery were determined, and based on a past event. The fact that he only has 20 minutes to get 100,000 and will be killed if he doesn’t pay it back (as he hopes avoid being killed and seek survival), is another agent that creates a motive for his actions.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Run Lola Run: Free Will vs. Determinism Argument #3

Another example and scene in the film that demonstrates this is on Lola’s second run where she obtains a gun from the cop and uses it to threaten father (at gunpoint) to give her $100,000 in cash. Lola obviously didn’t have to take the gun from the cop if she didn’t want to, but she did anyway base on her own desire to do so. This demonstrates the idea of free will again. However, from a determinist lens perspective, perhaps her action in doing so was determined. Based on how she had to come up with the $100000 to save Manni, her taking the gun to use age leverage was sparked by a previous action/experience that drove her to do so. Thus, since this happened on her second run/attempt, she had learned lessons previously from past run, which allowed her to experience empiricism. In following this scene and idea, I wanted to connect and point out something out that I also recognized in the film. Tykwer uses a bit of animation in this film, which can be seen the clip below. As viewers
Read more

Slumdog Millionaire (Determinism)

Image
In the film Slumdog Millionaire, t he movie opens with a question and a set of answers in the style of ‘Who Wants to be a Millionaire’. “Jamal Malik is one question away from winning 20 Million Rupees. How did he do it? (A) He cheated (B) He's lucky (C) He's a genius (D) It is written I thought that this was a clever approach in which the filmmakers did, since this is the exact same question and answer format that is seen on the game show “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire,” ( “WWTBM”) which plays a large role in the movie. Yet after seeing this phrase, it was brought to my attention that the themes of both Free Will vs Destiny (or determinism) were bound to be prominent over the course of the film. As free will and determinism have been debated for over centuries, Slumdog Millionaire demonstrates how we do not have free will, but rather, live by the idea of destiny and fate, as seen through Jamal’s character. In answering the question that is presented to
Read more

Run Lola Run: Free Will vs. Determinism Argument #2

Example #2: Each time Lola is running, she encounters different bystanders or strangers each time. What follows is a series of snapshots, which are glimpses into the future of each of the bystander’s lives of what happens when they encounter Lola running. For example, Lola bumps into a blonde elderly lady during her run, and we as viewers get a scoop on what happens to her in the future: In Run 1. She is stealing a child after her miscarriage In Run 2. Winning the lottery and living lavishly            In Run 3. Praying in the church of God and being baptised as a religious being I thought that the film’s use of this was quite unique. I interpreted that it was communicating with us how one person or a “minor occurrence” can have a huge impact on our fate. On each run, we see that the lady’s outcomes were different. In this case, it was Lola, whose presence seemed to have a drastic effect on the people’s lives. This kind of relates to the cause and effect chain in which d
Read more