Eureka! It's a Groundhog Day Connection!


In order to stop Manni from robbing the grocery store, this forces Lola to run to Manni’s aid in hopes of saving the day and his life all within 20 minutes. Each of the three versions of the 20 minutes in which Lola runs start out like each other, with a very similar sequence and action pattern, but then diverge to have different outcomes. In the first run, Lola is shot and fails. In the second run, Manni is shot dead which causes Lola to fail. In the third and final run, both Lola and Manni are successful in regaining the money to give to Ronnie, and they end up living.
Like our last blog post for last unit, I thought this film had a similar concept towards the film of Groundhog Day starring Bill Murray as Phil Conners. Living in an endless cycle of Groundhog Day on repeat, Phil’s days, routines, and interactions are always the same or similar to rest, but with different outcomes. But does Phil really have “Free Will?” What do you guys think? I mean, he can do whatever actions he wants ultimately, but each event and reliving each day seems to be on repeat, and “determined” in which he has no control of escaping. It’s like a cause and effect chain. I thought that both films had this connection to each other. In addition, Phil is given the chance to “Make things right” by learning to love others, learn from his mistakes, and have patience and compassion to be set free. In, Run Lola Run, the same principles seem to apply, as Lola also has three different chances to learn and redo her actions to get what she wants, which is saving Manni.

 Link: https://www.blogger.com/blogger.gblogID=3757384229936211480#allposts/src=sidebar




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Run Lola Run: Free Will vs. Determinism Argument #3

Another example and scene in the film that demonstrates this is on Lola’s second run where she obtains a gun from the cop and uses it to threaten father (at gunpoint) to give her $100,000 in cash. Lola obviously didn’t have to take the gun from the cop if she didn’t want to, but she did anyway base on her own desire to do so. This demonstrates the idea of free will again. However, from a determinist lens perspective, perhaps her action in doing so was determined. Based on how she had to come up with the $100000 to save Manni, her taking the gun to use age leverage was sparked by a previous action/experience that drove her to do so. Thus, since this happened on her second run/attempt, she had learned lessons previously from past run, which allowed her to experience empiricism. In following this scene and idea, I wanted to connect and point out something out that I also recognized in the film. Tykwer uses a bit of animation in this film, which can be seen the clip below. As viewers
Read more

Slumdog Millionaire (Determinism)

Image
In the film Slumdog Millionaire, t he movie opens with a question and a set of answers in the style of ‘Who Wants to be a Millionaire’. “Jamal Malik is one question away from winning 20 Million Rupees. How did he do it? (A) He cheated (B) He's lucky (C) He's a genius (D) It is written I thought that this was a clever approach in which the filmmakers did, since this is the exact same question and answer format that is seen on the game show “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire,” ( “WWTBM”) which plays a large role in the movie. Yet after seeing this phrase, it was brought to my attention that the themes of both Free Will vs Destiny (or determinism) were bound to be prominent over the course of the film. As free will and determinism have been debated for over centuries, Slumdog Millionaire demonstrates how we do not have free will, but rather, live by the idea of destiny and fate, as seen through Jamal’s character. In answering the question that is presented to
Read more

Run Lola Run: Free Will vs. Determinism Argument #2

Example #2: Each time Lola is running, she encounters different bystanders or strangers each time. What follows is a series of snapshots, which are glimpses into the future of each of the bystander’s lives of what happens when they encounter Lola running. For example, Lola bumps into a blonde elderly lady during her run, and we as viewers get a scoop on what happens to her in the future: In Run 1. She is stealing a child after her miscarriage In Run 2. Winning the lottery and living lavishly            In Run 3. Praying in the church of God and being baptised as a religious being I thought that the film’s use of this was quite unique. I interpreted that it was communicating with us how one person or a “minor occurrence” can have a huge impact on our fate. On each run, we see that the lady’s outcomes were different. In this case, it was Lola, whose presence seemed to have a drastic effect on the people’s lives. This kind of relates to the cause and effect chain in which d
Read more